Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 243 Ala. 80 - Smoot v. Miller

Smoot v. Miller’s Empirical Analysis

1942

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
March 1960
most recently cited

6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently March 1960

6 state decisions

20194219501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Kinney v. White · Patton v. Darden · Hale v. Cox · Webb & Aigner v. Darrow · Stanley v. Beck

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The orderly practice to be pursued in equity for an accounting is first to ascertain and decree that complainant is entitled to an accounting and then order a reference to state the account. 1 C.J.S. Accounting § 40, subsecs, a, b, and c, p. 680 et seq. The court in its discretion can dispense with the reference and proceed to state the account himself, after ascertaining that complainant is entitled to an accounting. People’s Sav. Bank of Tallassee v. Union Bank & Trust Co., 204 Ala. 406 , 85 So. 694 ; Hale v. Cox, 240 Ala. 622 , 200 So. 772 ; Stanley v. Beck, 242 Ala. 574 , 7 So.2d 276 ."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.