Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 243 ARK 230 - Armstrong v. Cook

Armstrong v. Cook’s Empirical Analysis

1967

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
May 2010
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently May 2010

10 state decisions

20196719701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Garland County Board of Election Commissioners v. Ennis

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““If that report, along with the order of the county court, were recorded, it is apparent that the description is so vague that the road could not be located from an examination of the records.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““We recommend that a 20 foot road be built at the same location where the old road is now. There will be no damage to the Cook Farm in the construction of this road.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.