Bradley County v. Adams’s Empirical Analysis
1967
Citation profile
14 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently November 1985
14 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Gillikin v. Burbage · Bearman v. Prudential Ins. · Bertram v. Wunning · 2 Wis. 2d 89 - Meyer v. Fronimades · Duke v. Pekin Wood Products Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““. . . (I)t is not our province to decide contested issues of fact in compensation cases, ... it is the responsibility of the Commission to draw inferences when the testimony is open to more than a single interpretation, and . . the Commission’s findings have the force of a jury verdict. These principles demand that the Commission’s decision in the case at hand be upheld.” Bradley County v. Adams, 243 Ark. 487 , 420 S. W. 2d 900 (1967).”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage““On tli© whole case, there is substantial evidence to support the Commission’s finding of fact, and the Circuit Court erred in setting aside the order of the Commission.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.