Uebe v. Bowman’s Empirical Analysis
1967
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently June 2000
2 federal appellate · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Riverside Land Co. v. Big Rock Stone & Material Co. · Heyden v. Barnsdall Refining Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“‘That for said consideration the right herein conveyed shall continue ... for a fixed period of 16 years from this date, with the option to the party of the second part, his heirs and assigns, to continue said right in full force and effect by the payment of the sum of $25.00 annually, payable in advance.’”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“When the option to extend here involved is read in its entirety, we hold that the trial court properly construed the provision for a payment ‘of the sum of $25 annually, payable in advance’ as a condition precedent to the exercise of the extension.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.