Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 243 Ark. 864 - Fletcher v. Bryant

Fletcher v. Bryant’s Empirical Analysis

1968

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
2
states following
October 2024
most recently cited

20 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently October 2024

20 state decisions

901968197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Westbrook v. McDonald · Say v. Baker · Leigh v. Hall · Sturdy v. Hall, Secretary of State · Arkansas Tax Commission v. Moore

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “is a clear implication that the general assembly intended that presumptions as to sufficiency of a ballot title approved by the Attorney General favor the sponsors of a referendum petition inasmuch as the act specifically provides for relief to them, but not opponents, by petition to this court.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““In determining the sufficiency of this ballot title, we will keep in mind that we give a liberal construction and interpretation of the requirements of Amendment 7 in order to secure its purposes to reserve to the people the right to adopt, reject, approve or disapprove legislation.” [Our emphasis]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “some significance must be given to the fact that the Arkansas Attorney General approved the ballot title....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.