Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 243 CONN 205 - State v. Piorkowski

State v. Piorkowski’s Empirical Analysis

1997

Citation profile

33
cited by 33 later decisions
3
states following
July 2025
most recently cited

33 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 33 later decisions — most recently July 2025 · most notably State v. Fernandez (2000), State v. Drakeford (2002)

33 state decisions

2501997200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Johnson v. Zerbst · Faretta v. California · Gideon v. Wainwright · Powell v. State of Alabama Patterson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Communicating With Adverse Party. During the course of representation of a client, a lawyer shall not communicate or cause another to communicate on the subject of the representation with a party the lawyer knows to be represented by another lawyer in that matter unless the lawyer has the prior consent of the lawyer representing such other party or is authorized by law to do so.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “scrupulously protects the right of an individual's access to counsel, we always have recognized that the right to counsel is a personal right”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “No person shall be compelled to give evidence against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty or property without due process of law ....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.