State v. Longo’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
29 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently January 2023 · most notably State v. Nowell (2003), State v. Smith (2001)
29 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Katz v. United States · Mapp v. Ohio · United States v. Ross · Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. P Casey P Casey · Mansion House Center South Redevelopment Co. v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[u]nder both the federal and state constitutions, the police must first obtain a warrant before conducting a search, unless an exception to the warrant requirement applies. See Katz v. United States, 389 U.S. 347 , 357 , 88 S.Ct. 507 , 19 L.Ed.2d 576 (1967) (warrant required before every search or seizure, `subject only to a few specifically established and well-delineated exceptions' [internal quotation marks omitted.]); State v. Badgett, 200 Conn. 412 , 423 , CT Page 13997 512 A.2d 160 , cert. denied, 479 U.S. 940 , 107 S.Ct. 423 , 93 L.Ed.2d 373 (1986).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“`[O]ur Supreme Court has recognized that article first , § 7 , of the Connecticut constitution contains an automobile exception to its warrant requirement, under which the police may search the passenger compartment of an automobile, including closed containers therein, on the roadside, upon probable cause to believe that they contain the fruits or instrumentalities of a crime'.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“If probable cause justifies the search of a lawfully stopped vehicle, it justifies the search of every part of the vehicle and its contents that may conceal the object of the search . . . The scope of a warrantless search of an automobile . . . is defined by the object of the search and the places in which there is probable cause to believe that it may be found.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.