Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

243 Conn. 943

State v. McClendon

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided November 6, 1997

Supreme Court of Connecticut · decided 1997-11-06

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently May 1999

5 state decisions

Relies on State v. McClendon

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1997-11-06

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 45 Conn. App. 658 (AC 15529), is granted, limited to the following issues:

¶2“1. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that, under the circumstances of this case, the trial court correctly held there was probable cause to support a warrant authorizing the seizure of the defendant for lineup and voice sample?

¶3“2. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that, under the circumstances of this case, the trial court did not abuse its discretion in refusing to permit the defendant from introducing a police report under the residual exception to the hearsay rule?

¶4“3. Did the Appellate Court properly affirm the trial court’s refusal to admit expert testimony on the subject of eyewitness identification and memory retention?”

/243/conn/943 · .json · Public domain