Haimowich v. Mandel’s Empirical Analysis
243 F. 338 · 1917
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
October 1927
most recently cited
3 federal appellate · 3 district ·
Relationships
Relies on In re A. B. Carton & Co. · In re Russell · In re Zoffer · In re Braverman · In re Haimowich
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“whether at that time the false statement was still in force and binding upon the bankrupt, to be determined according as it is found that the sale on credit was or was not the proximate result of the statement . . . and that its original falsity was or was not the thing that worked the mischief.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Gerdes v. Lustgarten“obtained money or property on credit upon a materially false statement in writing made by him to any person ... for the purpose of obtaining credit from such person,”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Gerdes v. Lustgarten“intended the statement to serve that end,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Gerdes v. Lustgarten
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.