Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 243 F.1d 391 - Lemley v. Dobson-Evans Co.

Lemley v. Dobson-Evans Co.’s Empirical Analysis

243 F. 391 · 1917

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
3
cited 3 times by the Supreme Court
January 1940
most recently cited

10 federal appellate · 5 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions (3 by the Supreme Court) — most recently January 1940

10 federal appellate · 5 district ·

1201917192019301940decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Loom Company v. Higgins · Bates v. Coe · Automatic Weighing Mach. Co. v. Pneumatic Scale Corp. · Ohmer Fare Register Co. v. Ohmer · Pope Manuf'G Co v. Gormully Jeffery Manuf'G Co

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “was not the original and first in ventor or discoverer of any material and substantial part of the thing patented.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.