Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 243 F.1d 56 - In re Midtown Contracting Co.

In re Midtown Contracting Co.’s Empirical Analysis

243 F. 56 · 1917

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
1
states following
October 1974
most recently cited

11 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently October 1974

11 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions

401917192019301940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Mueller v. Nugent · Fred Bardes v. First National Bank of Hawarden Iowa · Bryan v. Louis Bernheimer · Byron Babbitt v. Howard Dutcher T · Everett v. Judson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““If there is a real question either of law or of fact, the claimant need not submit it to the court of bankruptcy, unless he consents to do so. * * ' * ””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.