Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 243 F.1d 621 - Speidel v. N. Barstow Co.

Speidel v. N. Barstow Co.’s Empirical Analysis

243 F. 621 · 1917

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
May 1949
most recently cited

1 district ·

Relationships

Relies on Waterman v. Mackenzie · Pope Manuf'G Co v. Gormully Jeffery Manuf'G Co · F. Speidel Co. v. N. Barstow Co. · Plettenberg, Holthaus & Co. v. I. J. Kalmon & Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It is conceded by plaintiff's’ counsel that an alien enemy resident in his own country is under disability during the war to institute and maintain snit. That this disability applies to Fredrieh and Eugene Spoidel seems well settled by authority. According to good authority, however, this disability does not attach to the alien enemy plaintiffs resident in this country” (citing authorities).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. The Oropa

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.