Ex parte Dostal’s Empirical Analysis
243 F. 664 · 1917
Citation profile
9 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 15 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently November 2002
9 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Edye v. Robertson · Fong Yue Ting v. United States · Union Pacific Railway Co. v. Taggart · In re Grimley · Houston v. Moore
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““He may be released from the service by a timely application of the parent or guardian having a superior right to his custody or control. But this application must be made with reasonable diligence, after the parent has acquired knowledge of the actual enlistment, and before an offense has been committed by him.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Ex parte Rush
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.