Oliver Cassell v. Earl C. Taylor’s Empirical Analysis
243 F.2d 259 · 1957
Citation profile
6 federal appellate · 6 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently March 2004
6 federal appellate · 6 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Holmberg v. Armbrecht · Cope v. Anderson · Czaplicki v. the Hoegh Silvercloud · United States Arant v. Lane · Russell v. Todd
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In those instances where the court has concurrent jurisdiction to grant either equitable or legal relief in the enforcement of the asserted obligation, equity follows the law and the equitable remedy will be withheld if the local statute of limitations would bar the concurrent legal remedy.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. In Re Paul Valente
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.