Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 243 F.2d 284 - John L. Parks v. Atlanta Printing Pressmen And Assistant's Union No. 8

John L. Parks v. Atlanta Printing Pressmen And Assistant's Union No. 8’s Empirical Analysis

243 F.2d 284 · 1957

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
1
states following
December 1964
most recently cited

18 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Brooks v. National Labor Relations Board · United States v. Bell Aircraft Corp. · National Labor Relations Board v. McGahey · Konigsberg v. State Bar · Pollard v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “.“(a) It shall be unlawful, for the purposes of this section only, in an industry or activity affecting commerce, for any labor organization to engage in, or to induce or encourage the employees of any employer to engage in, a strike or a concerted refusal in the course of their employment to use, manufacture, process, transport, or otherwise handle or work on any goods, articles, materials, or commodities or to perform any services, where an object thereof is— * * * “(3) forcing or requiring any employer to recognize or bargain with a particular labor organization as the representative of his employees if another labor organization has been certified as the representative of such employees under the provisions of section 159 of this title.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.