Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 243 F.2d 504 - Commodity Credit Corp. v. Rosenberg Bros. & Co.

Commodity Credit Corp. v. Rosenberg Bros. & Co.’s Empirical Analysis

243 F.2d 504 · 1957

Citation profile

33
cited by 33 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
3
states following
June 2014
most recently cited

19 federal appellate · 4 district · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 33 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 2014 · most notably MedImmune, Inc. v. Genentech, Inc. (2007), 14 Cal. 3d 502 - Davies v. Krasna (1975)

19 federal appellate · 4 district · 4 state decisions

1801957196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Willard, Sutherland & Co. v. United States · Warren v. Stoddart · Simon v. Goodyear Metallic Rubber Shoe Co. · Early & Daniel Co. v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It is the general rule that one who is injured by the wrongful acts of another, whether as the result of a tort or of a breach of contract, is bound to exercise reasonable care and diligence to avoid loss or to minimize or lessen the resulting damage, and, to the extent that his damages are the result of his active and unreasonable enhancement thereof, or due to this failure to exercise such care, he cannot recover. * * * He must do nothing to aggravate his loss, but must do all he can to mitigate or reduce it.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[Wjhere a party is entitled to the benefit of a contract and can save himself from a loss arising from a breach of it at a trifling expense or with reasonable exertions, it is his duty to do it; and he can charge the delinquent with such damages only as, with reasonable endeavors and expense, he could not prevent.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.