Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

243 F.2d 667

Docket No. 13618.

Elbert v. United States

District of Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals

Argued April 18, 1957. Decided April 25, 1957. Petition for Rehearing In Banc Denied May 7, 1957.

District of Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1957-04-25

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently April 1957

2 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Relies on Consolidated Edison Co of New York v. National Labor Relations Board · Levers v. Berkshire · Mid-Valley Distilling Corp. v. De Carlo

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1957-04-25

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Mr. George C. Dreos, Washington, D.C., for appellant.

Mr. Nathan J. Paulson, Asst. U.S. Atty., with whom Messrs. Oliver Gasch, U.S. Atty., Lewis Carroll and Joel D. Blackwell, Asst. U.S. Attys., were on the brief, for appellee.

Before DANAHER, BASTIAN and BURGER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

¶1

Appellant asks us to reverse his conviction of robbery. There was ample and substantial evidence to support the jury's verdict. The charge as given was adapted to the issues and clearly adequate for the guidance of the jury. Moreover, there was no objection by appellant to the charge before the jury retired to consider its verdict, Rule 30, Fed.R.Crim.P., 18 U.S.C.A. There is no error.

¶2

Affirmed.

/243/f2d/667 · .json · Public domain