Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

243 F.2d 834

Docket No. 13567.

Marshall v. Brucker

District of Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals

Argued April 11, 1957. Decided April 26, 1957. Petition for Rehearing In Banc Denied May 21, 1957.

District of Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1957-04-26

Cited by 3 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 1958

2 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Relies on Harmon v. Brucker

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1957-04-26

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Mr. Donald B. MacGuineas, Atty., Dept. of Justice, with whom Asst. Atty. Gen. George C. Doub, Messrs. Paul A. Sweeney and Howard E. Shapiro, Attys., Dept. of Justice, were on the brief for appellee.

Mr. Edward H. Hickey, Atty., Dept. of Justice, at the time record was filed, also entered an appearance for appellee.

Before BAZELON, FAHY and DANAHER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

¶1

We are agreed that Harmon v. Brucker, 1957, 100 U.S.App.D.C. , 243 F.2d 613, is controlling here. If the question were open, Judge Bazelon would reverse for the reasons stated in his dissent in Harmon and Judge Fahy would wish to consider the question anew.

¶2

Affirmed.

/243/f2d/834 · .json · Public domain