Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 243 F.3d 1012 - Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Rockwell International Corp.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Rockwell International Corp.’s Empirical Analysis

243 F.3d 1012 · 2001

Citation profile

35
cited by 35 later decisions
1
states following
November 2017
most recently cited

16 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 12101 (§ 2 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990) · 42 U.S.C. § 12102 (§ 3 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990)

Relies on Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. · Karen Sutton Kimberly Hintons v. United Air Lines Inc · Murphy v. United Parcel Service, Inc. · Bolton v. Scrivner, Inc. · Davidson v. Midelfort Clinic, Ltd.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “29 C.F.R. sec. 1630.2(j)(3) (ii)(A)-(B). A”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “is not meant to require an onerous evidentiary showing.... [A]n individual [need not] identify the exact number of jobs using similar or dissimilar skills in a certain geographic area. Further, ... an individual [need not] count positions or otherwise present a precise number of jobs from which (s)he is disqualified because of an impairment. Instead, the reference to the “number and types” of jobs “only requirefs] the presentation of evidence of general employment demographics and/or of recognized occupational classifications that indicate the approximate number of jobs (e.g., ‘few,’ ‘many,’ ‘most’) from which an individual would be excluded because of an impairment.” Furthermore, in cases where it is clear that an individual is excluded from a class of jobs or a broad range of jobs in various classes, only minimal evidence will be required.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “a major life activity. Sutton v. United Airlines, Inc., 527 U.S. 471, 481 (1999). When the major life activity at issue is working, as it is in this case,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.