Anderson v. Sternes’s Empirical Analysis
243 F.3d 1049 · 2001
Citation profile
9 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently August 2020 · most notably Perruquet v. Briley (2004), Janosky v. St. Amand (2010)
9 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Patterson v. New York · United States v. Rogers · United States v. Hall · United States ex rel. Partee v. Lane
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“To succeed on an ineffective assistance claim, a defendant must establish that his counsel’s performance was constitutionally deficient, meaning that the performance fell below the legal profession’s objective standards for reasonably effective representation and that the deficiency prejudiced the defendant’s defense, meaning that there is a reasonable probability that but for [counsel’s] unprofessional errors, the results of the proceedings would have been different.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.