Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 243 F.3d 452 - Moring v. Arkansas Department of Correction

Moring v. Arkansas Department of Correction’s Empirical Analysis

243 F.3d 452 · 2001

Citation profile

67
cited by 67 later decisions
2
states following
August 2020
most recently cited

25 federal appellate · 9 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 67 later decisions — most recently August 2020 · most notably Ottman v. City of Independence (2003), Tuggle v. Mangan (2003)

25 federal appellate · 9 district · 2 state decisions

440200120102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc. · Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v. Vinson · Quick v. Donaldson Co. · Breeding v. Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. · Beardsley v. Webb

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 67 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) that she ‘belongs to a protected group,’ (2) that she has been sexually harassed by the defendant, (3) that the defendant’s conduct was based on the plaintiffs gender, (4) that the defendant’s conduct was unwelcome, and (5) ‘that the harassment affected a term, condition, or privilege of employment.’”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Howard v. Burns Bros., Inc., 149 F.3d 835 , 840 (8th Cir.1998) (quoting Harris v. Forklift Sys., Inc., 510 U.S. 17 , 21, 114 S.Ct. 367, 126 L.Ed.2d 295 (1993)). Relevant factors for determining whether conduct rises to the level of abusiveness include”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Harassment affects a term, condition, or privilege of employment if it is `sufficiently severe or pervasive to alter the conditions of the victim's employment and create an abusive working environment.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.