Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 243 F.3d 687 - Theresa Gregory v. Edward J. Daly

Theresa Gregory v. Edward J. Daly’s Empirical Analysis

243 F.3d 687 · 2001

Citation profile

382
cited by 382 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
3
states following
June 2025
most recently cited

47 federal appellate · 23 district · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 382 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 2025 · most notably Chambers v. Time Warner, Inc. (2002), Jackson v. Birmingham Board of Education (2005)

47 federal appellate · 23 district · 3 state decisions

2320200120102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green · Conley v. Gibson · Texas Department of Community Affairs v. Burdine · Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc. · Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 382 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “has already expressed a belief that [the plaintiff] is minimally qualified,”
    15 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “a plaintiff must plead facts that would tend to show the complained of conduct: (1) is objectively severe or pervasive— that is, creates an environment that a reasonable person would find hostile or abusive; (2) creates an environment that the plaintiff subjectively perceives as hostile or abusive; and (3) creates such an environment because of the plaintiffs sex.”
    10 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “unless it appears beyond doubt that the plaintiff can prove no set of facts in support of his claim which would entitle him to relief.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.