Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 243 FAPPX 920 - Redmon v. Mineta, Sec

Redmon v. Mineta, Sec’s Empirical Analysis

2007

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
May 2018
most recently cited

1 district ·

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 701 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964) · 5 U.S.C. § 7121

Relies on Brown v. General Services Administration · Smith v. First Union National Bank · Randolph v. Ohio Department of Youth Services · Hollins v. Methodist Healthcare, Inc. · Bonner v. Merit Systems Protection Board

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The fact that [the plaintiff] advanced different legal theories to challenge these actions in the union grievance and EEO complaint is inconsequential”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “refer[s] to the underlying government action which precipitated the complaint[,]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.