Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 243 F. Supp. 2d 179 - Belitskus v. Pizzingrilli

243 F. Supp. 2d 179 - Belitskus v. Pizzingrilli’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
September 2003
most recently cited

2 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Roe v. Wade · Bullock v. Carter · Burdick v. Takushi · Lubin v. Panish

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “otherwise requiring candidates to pay a filing fee they cannot afford in order to appear on the ballot.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “did not present evidence establishing that [he] could not afford to pay the filing fee,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “candidates who cannot afford to pay the filing fee”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.