Mead Corp. v. Masterack’s Empirical Analysis
1979
Citation profile
8 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently October 2018
8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Orkin Exterminating Co. v. Martin Co. · McCurry v. Bailey · Clements v. Warner Robins Supply Co. · 127 Ga. App. 284 - TRAVIS MEAT &C. CO. INC. v. Ashworth · 130 Ga. App. 140 - International Service Insurance v. Bowen
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]he trial court has a wide discretion in the entering of orders to prevent the use of discovery which is unreasonably burdensome, unduly expensive, or directed to irrelevant or immaterial matter.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.