Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 243 Ga. App. 331 - Smith v. State

243 Ga. App. 331 - Smith v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
January 2007
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Fugate v. State · Holcomb v. State · Smith v. State · Williams v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Although leading questions are generally allowed only on cross-examination, the trial court has discretion to allow leading questions on direct examination where the witness is nervous, ignorant or hostile. OCGA § 24-9-63; Fugate v. State, 263 Ga. 260, 265 ( 431 SE2d 104 ) (1993). “It would be a rare case in which the trial court’s exercise of discretion on this issue would warrant reversal.” Id.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.