Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 243 GAAPP 648 - State v. Corriher

State v. Corriher’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
October 2000
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 230 Ga. App. 866 - Helmeci v. State · 141 Ga. App. 861 - Sheffield v. Cotton States Mutual Insurance · 223 Ga. App. 353 - Corner v. State · 173 Ga. App. 241 - State v. Holton · 193 Ga. App. 229 - Department of Education v. Kitchens

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Chemical analysis of the person's blood, urine, breath, or other bodily substance, to be considered valid under this Code section, shall have been performed according to methods approved by the Division of Forensic Sciences of the Georgia Bureau of Investigation and by an individual possessing a valid permit issued by the Division of Forensic Sciences for this purpose. The Division of Forensic Sciences of the Georgia Bureau of Investigation is authorized to approve satisfactory techniques or methods to ascertain the qualifications and competence of individuals to conduct analyses and to issue permits, which shall be subject to termination or revocation at the discretion of the Division of Forensic Sciences.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Unless otherwise specifically provided by law, technical, scientific, and similar processes, procedures, guidelines, standards, and methods for the collection, preservation, or testing of evidence adopted by the [Division of Forensic Sciences of the Georgia Bureau of Investigation] shall not be subject to the ... Administrative Procedure Act.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.