Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 243 ILLAPP3D 1038 - People v. Lee

People v. Lee’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
1
states following
July 2025
most recently cited

19 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently July 2025

19 state decisions

1201993200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 122 Ill. 2d 176 - People v. Enoch · 67 Ill. 2d 564 - People v. Manion · 128 Ill. 2d 1 - People v. Young · 113 Ill. 2d 256 - People v. Saldivar · 79 Ill. 2d 103 - People v. Greer

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[i]n view of the contradictions between [a witness's] statement and his trial testimony, it is understandable that a jury would find it valuable to review the same.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “The use of deadly force is limited to those situations where (a) the threatened force will cause death or great bodily harm, or (b) the force threatened is a forcible felony.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “overemphasized the statement and encouraged the jury to reject his self-defense argument,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.