Gennaitte v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1963
Citation profile
26 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently November 1980 · most notably Sanford v. State (1971), 153 Ind. App. 590 - McHaney v. State (1972)
26 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Hauk v. State · Beck v. State · Mayhew v. State · Henderson v. State · Robinson v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““ . the offering of a forged instrument, knowing it to be such, with a representation that it is genuine and with an intent to defraud. . . .’ ” Gennaitte v. State (1962), 243 Ind. 532 , 188 N.E.2d 412 .”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage““ ‘Uttering is the offering of a forged instrument, knowing it to be such, with a representation that it is genuine, and with an intent to defraud. It is not essential that the accused should have been implicated in the forgery, that the instrument be accepted as genuine, or that anyone be actually prejudiced by it.’ 37 C. J. S., Forgery § 37, p. 57.” (Emphasis supplied.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.