Thies v. Cooper’s Empirical Analysis
1988
Citation profile
10 district · 41 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 52 later decisions — most recently September 2018 · most notably Nero v. Kansas State University (1993), Smith v. Printup (1993)
10 district · 41 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Ling v. Jan's Liquors · Otis Engineering Corp. v. Clark · Durflinger v. Artiles · 171 W. Va. 607 - Robertson v. LeMaster · 105 Wash. 2d 457 - Dickinson v. Edwards
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 52 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““It is the general rule that an actor has no duty to control the conduct of a third person to prevent that person from causing harm to others unless a ‘special relationship’ exists between ■ the actor and the third party or the actor and the injured party. Restatement (Second) of Torts § 315 (1963).””
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority““An employer is liable for the tortious acts of an employee only under special circumstances. Special circumstances exist when the employee is on the employer’s premises, performing work for the employer, or using the employer’s chattel; when the employer voluntarily assumes a duty to control the employee; or when the employer negligently retains a known incompetent or unfit employee.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority““[W]hether, under Kansas law, an employer who makes available free cereal malt beverages in uncontrolled amounts to its employees on the employer’s premises may be held hable for all foreseeable consequences of its acts and omissions, including torts committed by employees while driving home from the workplace in an intoxicated condition.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.