Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 243 Kan. 326 - State v. Henwood

State v. Henwood’s Empirical Analysis

1988

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
2
states following
May 1998
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Heath v. Alabama · State v. Craven · City of Baxter Springs v. Bryant · State v. Russell · Earwood v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Subsection (l)(a) applies where all or part of a crime is committed in the state. Where the entire crime is committed in Kansas, there is no problem of jurisdiction. However, this subsection, as amplified by subsection (2) makes it clear that the state has jurisdiction where any element or the result of the crime occurs in Kansas. Under (l)(a) two states may have concurrent jurisdiction over the same crime.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.