Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 243 Kan. 404 - State v. Longobardi

State v. Longobardi’s Empirical Analysis

1988

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
1
states following
August 2024
most recently cited

20 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently August 2024

20 state decisions

8019881990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Boykin v. Alabama · Lefkowitz v. Turley · Ullmann v. United States · Ullmann v. United States · State v. Wheaton

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[a]t what point does a defendant's Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination end after his plea of guilty has been accepted?”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “ends after sentence is imposed where a plea of guilty has been regularly accepted by the court, and no motion is made to withdraw it.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “protect[] both a defendant and any other witness whose answers may expose him [or her] to future criminal liability,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.