Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 243 KAN 682 - Vogeler v. Owen

Vogeler v. Owen’s Empirical Analysis

1988

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
February 2015
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Wirt v. Esrey · Neagle v. Brooks · Hughes v. Martin · Newell v. Brollier · In Re the Estate of Newland

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““K.S.A. 60-260(b) was not intended as an alternative method of appellate review nor as a means of circumventing time limits on appeal, except where required by compelling considerations of justice. It does not provide a procedure to challenge a supposed legal error of the court, nor to obtain relief from errors which are readily correctable on appeal. [Citation omitted.]””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.