State v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis
1988
Citation profile
2 district · 15 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently November 2018
2 district · 15 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Wong Sun v. United States · Mapp v. Ohio · Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San Francisco · New Jersey v. T. L. O. · See v. City of Seattle
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"[T]he Fourth Amendment prohibition against unreasonable searches protects against warrantless intrusions during civil as well as criminal investigations. [Citation omitted.] The reason is found in the "basic purpose of this Amendment . [which] is to safeguard the privacy and security of individuals against arbitrary invasions by governmental officials." [Citation omitted.] If the government intrudes on a person's property, the privacy interest suffers, whether the government's motivation is to investigate violations of criminal laws or breaches of other statutory or regulatory standards.'" State v. Smith, 243 Kan. 715, 720-721 , 763 P.2d 632 (1988) (citing Marshall v. Barlow's, Inc., 436 U.S. 307 , 98 S.Ct. 1816 , 56 L.Ed.2d 305 [1978]).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[T]he Fourth Amendment prohibition against unreasonable searches protects against warrantless intrusions during civil as well as criminal investigations. [Citation omitted.] The reason is found in the”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“is to deter law enforcement and other government officials and agents from unreasonable intrusions upon the lives and property of citizens.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.