Victor v. D. E. Meyer Co.’s Empirical Analysis
1928
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
June 1931
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on John D. Gruber Co. v. Smith · Linderman Machine Co. v. Shaw-Walker Co. · Kawecki v. Stuber-Stone Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Obviously, the plaintiffs cannot recover on the theory of rescission and surrender of the property purchased, because they have not restored to the vendor the thing purchased, nor have they kept good a tender of restoration. This is essential to rescission and recovery in an action at law.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.