243 N.C. 626
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided February 29, 1956
Supreme Court of North Carolina · decided 1956-02-29
Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently April 1978
4 state decisions
Relies on Burgess v. Trevathan
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1956-02-29
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1This appeal, as in the case of Burgess v. Trevathan, 236 N.C. 157, 72 S.E. 2d 231, falls under the ban of “the general rule that ordinarily an order allowing a motion for the joinder of an additional party is not appealable.” In consequence, it must be dismissed.
¶2Appeal dismissed.