Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

243 N.C. 627

91 S.E.2d 671

Byrd v. Hampton

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 29, 1956

Supreme Court of North Carolina · decided 1956-02-29

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently July 1982

6 state decisions

Relies on Roberts v. Hill

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1956-02-29

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Per OüRIAm.

¶1 There were, as stated, a number of interlocutory rulings made during the progress of the trial. However, no final judgment was entered from which an appeal could be prosecuted, and the court, in the exercise of its discretion, set the verdict aside. Roberts v. Hill, 240 N.C. 373, 82 S.E. 2d 373. Hence the record as it now appears before us contains no final judgment from which appeal will lie. In view of this condition of the record, it is necessary to vacate, without prejudice, all interlocutory rulings made during the progress of the trial, and to remand the cause for a trial de novo as to all parties and as to all questions raised by the pleadings. It is so ordered.

¶2 Venire de novo.

/243/nc/627 · .json · Public domain