243 N.C. App. 142 - State v. Pender’s Empirical Analysis
2015
Citation profile
11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
states following
November 2018
most recently cited
11 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · State v. Smith · State v. Fritsch · 186 N.C. App. 57 - State v. Smith · State v. Fulcher
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“preserved [the defendant's] insufficient evidence arguments with respect to all of his convictions”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“exceptional circumstances ... in which a fundamental purpose of the appellate rules is at stake.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“Even assuming, without deciding, that defendant's trial counsel's performance was deficient, defendant cannot show the requisite prejudice since, even if the alleged variances were made the basis for his motion to dismiss, the motion should have in any event been denied.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.