243 N.C. App. 156 - State v. Perry’s Empirical Analysis
2015
Citation profile
5 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2703 (§ 201 of the Electronic Communications Privacy Act of 1986)
Relies on Katz v. United States · United States v. Leon · Coolidge v. New Hampshire · Sedillo v. United States · Pennsylvania v. Ritchie
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“On appeal, this Court is required to examine the documents to determine if they contain information that is 'both favorable to the accused and material to [either his] guilt or punishment.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. State v. Valentine“(1) the individual manifested a subjective expectation of privacy in the object of the challenged search [;] and, (2) society is willing to recognize that expectation as reasonable.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“We hold that the government conducts a search under the Fourth Amendment when it obtains and inspects a cell phone user’s historical CSLI for an extended period of time”;”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. Ford, Jon Thomas
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.