Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 243 N.C. App. 628 - State v. Hicks

243 N.C. App. 628 - State v. Hicks’s Empirical Analysis

2015

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
2
states following
May 2019
most recently cited

16 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Arizona v. Youngblood · State v. Williams · State v. Searles · State v. Gaiten · State v. Springer

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “This Court reviews a trial court's ruling on the admission of evidence over a party's hearsay objection de novo .”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “'Hearsay' is a statement, other than one made by the declarant while testifying at the trial or hearing, offered in evidence to prove the truth of the matter asserted.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “9. Judge Letts did not issue a specific destruction order for the materials seized pursuant to the warrant nor was such an order later entered. The officers executing the warrant, however, were under the erroneous belief and understanding that such authorization was given as a result of the destruction request made in the warrant. It has been and is the custom and practice of law enforcement in the execution of search warrants resulting in the collection of materials used in the manufacture of methamphetamine to attempt to neutralize the materials and then destroy the materials due to their hazardous nature, inability to preserve and store the items safely and properly for evidentiary purposes, and to prevent injury from the materials. 10. The officers in the execution of the search warrant and in collecting the materials had a good faith belief that the items were to be destroyed pursuant to Court authorization, and did not act in bad faith when they proceeded with the destruction process and had the collected materials destroyed.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.