Jacobson v. Higgins’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
20 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently March 2024
20 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Canas v. Maryland Casualty Co. · Bituminous Casualty Corp. v. Deyle · Larson v. Jensen · Lutjemeyer Ex Rel. Lutjemeyer v. Dennis · State v. Tonge
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“ARTICLE I Definitions As used in this compact: (c) Conviction means a conviction of any offense related to the use or operation of a motor vehicle which is prohibited by state law ... or a forfeiture of bail, bond, or other security deposited to secure appearance by a person charged with having committed any such offense, and which conviction or forfeiture is required to be reported to the licensing authority. ARTICLE II Reports of Conviction The licensing authority of a party state shall report each conviction of a person from another party state occurring within its jurisdiction to the licensing authority of the home state of the licensee. Such report shall clearly identify the person convicted; describe the violation specifying the section of the statute . . . violated; identify the court in which action was taken; indicate whether a plea of guilty or not guilty was entered, or the conviction was a result of the forfeiture of bail, bond or other security; and shall include any special findings made in connection therewith. ARTICLE III Effect of Conviction (b) [T]he licensing authority in the home state shall give such effect to the conduct as is provided by the laws of the home state.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Strong v. Neth
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.