Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 243 Pa. Super. 349 - Crislip v. Harshman

243 Pa. Super. 349 - Crislip v. Harshman’s Empirical Analysis

1976

Citation profile

51
cited by 51 later decisions
1
states following
October 2009
most recently cited

51 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 51 later decisions — most recently October 2009 · most notably 2001 Pa. Super. 50 - Lachat v. Hinchliffe (2001), 332 Pa. Super. 461 - Neshaminy Water Resources Authority v. Del-Aware Unlimited, Inc. (1984)

51 state decisions

2801976198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Knaus v. Knaus · In Re Martorano · Commonwealth Ex Rel. Magaziner v. Magaziner · Catena v. Seidl · 232 Pa. Super. 365 - Simmons v. Simmons

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 51 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) a rule to show cause why an attachment should not issue, (2) an answer and hearing, (3) a rule absolute (arrest), (4) a hearing on the contempt citation, and (5) an adjudication of contempt.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “In other words, it is a several step process that must take place to hold one in civil contempt — rule to show cause why an attachment should not issue, answer and hearing, rule absolute (arrest), hearing on the contempt citation, adjudication of contempt.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “1) rule to show cause why attachment should not issue; 2) answer and hearing; 3) rule absolute; 4) hearing on contempt citation; and 5) adjudication of contempt.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.