Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 243 SO2D 198 - Vietor v. Sill

Vietor v. Sill’s Empirical Analysis

1971

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
3
states following
March 2005
most recently cited

5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently March 2005

5 state decisions

401971198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““There is no requirement of a binding contract between the apartment seller and a third party to activate the other apartment owners’ preemptive rights under the agreement. When the defendant notified the other owners of her 'intention’ to sell and the terms and conditions demanded, the other apartment owners then became entitled to buy on those terms. And when one of them agreed to the stated terms and conditions and tendered performance, the defendant became obligated to sell.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.