Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

243 So. 3d 1013

Walker v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2018-05-16

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently January 2019

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2018-05-16

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Per Curiam.

¶1We affirm the convictions and sentences in all respects. We remand to the circuit court for correction of the written revocation order to conform to the court's oral pronouncement. The written order contains a violation for failing to undergo a drug and alcohol evaluation; in its oral pronouncement, the court ruled that violation had not been established. The written order also contains a violation for committing the offense of possession of a firearm by a convicted felon; however, the state nolle prossed that count at sentencing after the court's oral pronouncement.

¶2Affirmed and remanded for correction .

¶3Warner, Gross and Levine, JJ., concur.

/243/so3d/1013 · .json · Public domain