Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 243 SW2D 474 - Funk v. Fielder

Funk v. Fielder’s Empirical Analysis

1951

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
April 2010
most recently cited

3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently April 2010

3 state decisions

201951196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Kerby v. Luhrs · Gabbert v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. · Keenan v. Price · McCreary v. Speer · Hatcher, SEC. of State v. Meredith, Atty. Gen.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Since it [a predecessor to KRS 118.415] is but a statute implementing the machinery of the Constitution in this respect, it should be given a liberal construction in its application. If the question is not misleading or inconsistent and reveals the essential character and purpose of the proposed amendment, it must be deemed to meet the requirements of the Constitution and the statute.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.