Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 243 S.W.2d 490 - Eversole v. Webb

Eversole v. Webb’s Empirical Analysis

1951

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
April 1964
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Hays v. Sturgill · Triplett v. Bays · Bradford v. Kirby

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “When a matter is in litigation the parties to it are required to bring forward their whole case. The plea of res judicata applies not only to the points placed in issue by the parties upon which the court is required to pronounce judgment but to every point which properly belonged to the subject of litigation and which the parties by reasonable diligence might have brought forward at the time. Res judicata is binding upon privies as well as parties to the former action.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.