Shane v. Commonwealth’s Empirical Analysis
2007
Citation profile
48
cited by 48 later decisions
8
states following
May 2019
most recently cited
48 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Batson v. Kentucky · Kotteakos v. United States · United States v. Marion · United States v. Lovasco · Doggett v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 48 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“, he did not believe they would lie under oath because they took the oath more seriously; and that he would find it more likely that a police officer was telling the truth than a lay witness. Shane, 243 S.W.3d at 337 . The trial Court refused to excuse the prospective juror for cause because the juror”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority““The court must weigh the probability of bias or prejudice based on the entirety of the juror’s responses and demeanor. There is no ‘magical question’ that can rehabilitate a juror as impartiality is not a technical question but a state of mind.” (Id. at 338)”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Harmless error analysis is simply not appropriate where a substantial right is involved.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.