Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

243 S.W.3d 492

Young v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided January 15, 2008

Missouri Court of Appeals · decided 2008-01-15

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently March 2011

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2008-01-15

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

¶2Shawn Young appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.151 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. Young argues that he was denied his right to effective assistance of counsel. We find that the motion court’s findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

¶3. All references to Rules are to Missouri Supreme Court Rules (2007).

/243/sw3d/492 · .json · Public domain