Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 243 U.S. 426 - Bunting v. State

Bunting v. State’s Empirical Analysis

243 U.S. 426 · 1917

Citation profile

169
cited by 169 later decisions
24
cited 24 times by the Supreme Court
19
states following
June 2015
most recently cited

23 federal appellate · 14 district · 60 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 169 later decisions (24 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 2015 · most notably Shapiro v. Thompson (1969), Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. P Casey P Casey (1992)

23 federal appellate · 14 district · 60 state decisions — followed in 19 states

52019171920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedState v. Bunting

Relationships

Relies on Joseph Lochner v. People of the State of New York · Henning Jacobson v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts · Connolly v. Union Sewer Pipe Co. · Allgeyer v. State of Louisiana · Holden v. Hardy

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 169 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It is enough for our decision if the legislation under review was passed in the exercise of an admitted power of government; and that it is not as complete as it might be, not as rigid in its prohibitions as it might be, gives, perhaps, evasion too much play, is lighter in its penalties than it might be, is no impeachment of its legality. This may be a blemish, giving opportunity for criticism and difference in characterization, but the constitutional validity of legislation cannot be determined by the degree of exactness of its provisions or remedies. New policies are usually tentative in their beginnings, advance in firmness as they advance in acceptance. ‘ They do not at a particular .moment of time spring full perfect in extent or means from the legislative brain. Time may. be necessary to fashion them to precedent customs and conditions, and as they justify themselves or otherwise, they pass from militancy to triumph or from question to repeal.””
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““But, passing general considerations, and coming back to our immediate concern, which is the validity of the particular exertion of power in the Oregon law, our judgment of it is that it does not transcend constitutional limits.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.