United States v. Solomon Kenofskey’s Empirical Analysis
243 U.S. 440 · 1917
Citation profile
281 federal appellate · 16 district · 6 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 353 later decisions (10 by the Supreme Court) — most recently May 2017 · most notably Pereira v. United States (1954), Kann v. United States (1944)
281 federal appellate · 16 district · 6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Demolli v. United States · United States v. Kenofskey
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 353 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“is a word of very broad import and its meaning is generally known. It is used in the section in its well-known sense of bringing about, and in such sense it is applicable to the conduct of Kenofskey. He deliberately calculated the effect of giving the false proofs to his superior officer; and the effect followed, demonstrating the efficacy of his selection of means. Id. at 443, 37 S.Ct. at 439. 13 In our view, Instruction No. 4.05, which defines”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.